Ghostscript Diffs

http://ghostscript.com/~regression/release__gs/

Ken has identified the following problems and guessed at the following people to look at them.

Updated; 7th March 2017, removed old 'faults' added new ones.

Michael:

https://ghostscript.com/~regression/release__gs/compare3.html

• test 527 Altona_Technical_1v1_x3.pdf.psdcmyk.72.0. Note that according to the logs there were diffs on all configs

Opened Bug 697653.

https://ghostscript.com/~regression/release__gs/compare4.html

• Test 537 altona_technical_1v2_x3.pdf.psdcmyk.72.0 as above, diffs in all tests
• test 549 Altona_Technical_v20_x4.pdf.psdcmykog.144.0 again, all tests show diffs in logs

Test 537 is the same issue as opened for 697653. Test 549 is a progression.

https://ghostscript.com/~regression/release__gs/compare68.html 16:19.51

• test 4761, the gray blends have gone cyan (I thought you fixed that) and the body of the black rectangle (red AMATER logo) seems too dark to me

I am unable to replicate this problem.

I suspect all of these are progressions/don't care but would really like a second opinion.

Ken

https://ghostscript.com/~regression/release__gs/compare12.html

• test 1029 tests_private/comparefiles/Bug690497.pdf.ps.pkmraw.300.0 page 3 errored ?

evaluate PDF->PDF diffs, eg https://ghostscript.com/~regression/release__gs/compare17.html test 1318 tests_private/comparefiles/Bug691831.pdf.pdf.psdcmyk.300.1

At least some of these appear to be progressions, but would like to check a sample of others to see why they are different, though visually the same.

-- Robin Watts - 2017-02-22

Comments